In the course of flopping around looking for an answer to the busting problem, I may have stumbled upon a solution. It's really stupid if it's what I suspect it is.

2.22 CB William Luster Vol: 20 +15/+3 Now 44/70

Do I really need to reach so far to find anyone fast? Maybe tanking is a legitimate strategy after all, since top picks are so precious.

2.24 RG Chris Lindo Vol: 2 +9/-2 Now 49/76

Perhaps I could have reached for speed again, but the low vol enticed me. I should have known that it wouldn't count for much.

3.9 SLB Michael Burroughs Vol: 24 +6/+1 Now 41/69

A converted safety will easily find a home at LB. He lost a lot of speed in the transition, which is probably why I got away with this.

3.22 FB Clay Lilly Vol: 30 +3/-3 Now 33/59

Apparently the bias against speed overrides any other bona fides this guy might have.

3.24 TE Jay Jones Vol: 100 +12/+12 Now 44/87

He comes along just in time. If only he could be fast.

7.9 P Clinton Cisneros Vol: 100 +1/-17 Now 52/66

I already had a good punter, which is a Good Thing.

If you care to share your theory, we could increase the sample size. :P

1. I don't know if this works.
2. If I ever did find out, I *wouldn't* tell you. No offense, but I'm trying to win too.
3. The only theories you're likely to get are bogus and meant for your consumption. Anything that might possibly be right would be a jealously guarded secret. I choose not to be so crass.